Regulations Governing Special Consideration (including Deadline Extension Requests) for all Taught Programmes and Taught Assessed Components of Research Degrees 2024-25

1.1 Individual students enrolled and registered at the University of Southampton on a credit-bearing taught or pre-sessional programme. 

1.2 Individual students enrolled and registered at the University of Southampton on a research degree with a taught component with regard to assessments for the taught components of the degree only. 

1.3 A member of staff may ask for special consideration for a situation affecting groups or cohorts of students as set out in A2.2 below. 

2.1 A student may apply for Special Consideration following the process in Section B if: there were exceptional circumstances outside of their control; and these have or will negatively affect their performance in a recent or upcoming assessment (including an exam) or ability to meet a deadline for submission of an assessment or to sit an examination. 

2.2 Raised by a member of staff: A member of staff may use these Regulations where they are aware of exceptional circumstances that were outside of the control of a group/cohort of students that are likely to negatively impact performance in an assessment or their ability to meet a deadline for submission of an assessment or to sit an examination. See the procedure in section B. 

• 3.1.1 do not apply to medium to long term conditions as ongoing support for these is provided by means of reasonable adjustments arranged by Student Disability and Inclusion. Details of the support offered can be found at http://southampton.likn.co/edusupport/disability_support/index.page
  However, if a student with a medium to long term condition experiences a sudden short term worsening of the condition, they may use the Special Consideration procedure to request additional mitigation for the short term impact on their studies.  

• 3.1.2 do not apply to situations in which a student can or could have taken reasonable steps either to avoid or to mitigate the impact on their performance;
• 3.1.3 do not allow for the marking process or a student's marks to be adjusted. A request for Special Consideration shall remain distinct from the marking process and actual marks shall be determined solely on the basis of work submitted. However, the Special Consideration Board may recommend that marks are disregarded as set out in section A6 below;
• 3.1.4 do not cover requests to extend candidature or to address matters affecting the submission of theses for research degrees. Postgraduate research students wishing to suspend their studies or extend their candidature due to exceptional circumstances should refer to the Code of Practice for Research Candidature and Supervision and Regulations for Research Degrees.

5.1.1 The Deputy Head of School (Education) shall establish Special Consideration Board(s) at either School or Academic Discipline level, to consider requests for special consideration made by students enrolled in that School. 

5.1.2 In addition to the terms of reference outlined in these regulations, Special Consideration Boards will take due account of any requirements from relevant Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Bodies (PSRBs) which govern the registration of students entering a relevant profession. 

5.1.3 Each Special Consideration Board shall be constituted as follows: 

• The Chair: a nominee of the Deputy Head of School (Education) (where a School has multiple Boards, the chair should wherever possible be the same for each Board) 
• Exams Officer(s) 
• Director of Programmes or nominee
• Head of Faculty Student Administration/Admin and Assessment Team Leader or nominee 
• Senior Tutor(s) 
• Special Consideration Assessors 
• Co-opted members as deemed necessary by the Chair 

5.1.4 Each discipline will be responsible for determining the appropriate individuals to undertake the initial review of cases, e.g. it could be a specific appointment, senior tutor, exam officer or another appropriate member of the committee (but not the chair).  Selected academic members of the Special Consideration Board who undertake the initial review of Special Consideration cases will be referred to here as Special Consideration Assessors (SCAs).  

5.1.5 The SCAs will have delegated authority to make decisions on whether a case is appropriate to be considered, in line with the Regulations, so this can be communicated to students in a timely manner.  The SCAs will also have delegated authority for dealing with requests from students for an extension of a deadline or removing a late penalty to ensure that timely decisions are made and communicated to the student.   

5.1.6 SCAs will also prepare recommendations for the Board on proposed outcomes.  Where those recommendations relate to straight forward cases, SCAs should ensure these provisional recommendations are communicated to the student.  The SCAs should work with the relevant administrative team to ensure that all other cases are referred to the full Special Consideration Board.  Further guidance on the role of the Special Consideration Assessors can be found in the Quality Handbook. 

5.1.7 The role of the Chair is to ensure that the Board carries out its responsibilities in a fair, transparent and impartial manner and in accordance with relevant University and programme regulations and procedures. The Chair ensures that members have the opportunity to contribute to discussions and that business is conducted fairly. 

5.1.8 The Board may consult and/or take advice from other relevant Faculties or Professional Services. 

5.1.9 Decisions of each Special Consideration Board shall be made by a simple majority vote, with the Chair having a casting vote. 

5.1.10 Personal Academic Tutors will not be able to vote on the outcome of a case for their own tutees. Members of Special Consideration Boards who are also the personal academic tutor of a student making a request for a special consideration shall not participate in any discussion related to that request and shall refrain from making a decision in connection with that request. They may however provide the student with a  statement to be included as supporting information. 

5.1.11 Special Consideration Boards shall be responsible to schedule their own regular meetings to be held at least once prior to each meeting of the School’s Board of Examiners. Each Special Consideration Board may decide to schedule more regular meetings or arrange extraordinary meetings when necessary. 

5.1.12 All Special Consideration Boards must keep formal minutes of their proceedings. The purpose of the minutes of Special Consideration Board is to record decisions, to summarise any discussion relevant to those decisions (where this is required to give a context or rationale for the decision, or to establish precedents), and to capture for further consideration any areas of discussion or requirements for future action. Decisions regarding extensions should also be recorded. 

5.1.13 The Special Consideration Assessors and Boards must be assured that the overall programme learning outcomes have been met before making a recommendation. 

5.2.4 Boards of Examiners shall consider recommendations from Special Consideration Boards before determining the student's result and any progression decision arising from the result. 

5.2.5 In all cases the Board of Examiners must be assured that overall programme learning outcomes have been met before implementing a recommendation by the Special Consideration Board. 

6.1 The Special Consideration Assessors will decide whether the case is appropriate in line with the Regulations and may decide to grant an extension to a deadline for submission of an assessment, or remove a late penalty, where they are satisfied that Special Consideration should be applied.  

• 6.2.3 Remove the capping of marks in a referral or repeat. 

• 6.2.4 Allow a student to retain the right of referral during a repeat.  

• 6.2.5 Disregard marks for specific module(s), in computing the aggregate mark or classification. 

• 6.2.6 Disregard an element of a module assessment and re-compute module mark based on completed components. 

• 6.2.7 That a special consideration request be considered by a future Board of Examiners. In the final year it may be possible to revisit performance in earlier years where there was special consideration that may or may not have had an impact on the degree classification. 

• 6.2.8 No further action. 

6.3 When deciding which recommendations to make, Special Consideration Boards should always: 

• 6.3.1 consider allowing a student an additional attempt in preference to disregarding marks, elements, or modules, making this latter recommendation only when additional attempts are not possible or practical; and

• 6.3.2 carefully consider the effects of the recommendation so that a student is not given an unfair advantage; the objective is as far as possible to put a student in the position they would have been in had the exceptional circumstances not occurred; and

• 6.3.3 be assured that overall programme learning outcomes and PSRB requirements have been met.

6.4 The Special Consideration Board may consider whether a student's performance has been negatively affected with reference to that student's overall marks profile when making a recommendation. 

6.5 Where 6.2.2 above is recommended, marks for the disregarded attempt will not appear on transcripts; however, a note will appear confirming that the attempt has been disregarded due to Special Consideration. Marks disregarded in accordance with 6.2.5 however will appear on transcripts.

6.6 Where additional attempts are granted, the marks obtained in the additional attempt will be inserted into the student's marks profile, in accordance with the relevant progression regulations, regardless of whether these are higher or lower than the original mark obtained. 

6.7 In addition to the outcome recommendation, the Special Consideration Boards may recommend: 

• 6.7.1 That a student attend a meeting with a senior member of academic staff to discuss their circumstances;

• 6.7.2 That a student must seek support from Student Disability and Inclusion and / or Student Wellbeing (the Board should report such recommendations to the relevant team who will attempt to make contact with the student);

• 6.7.3 a Student Support Review;

• 6.7.4 that the Fitness to Practise Procedure is considered.

6.8 Should a student fail to seek appropriate support (e.g. from Student Disability and Inclusion and / or Student Wellbeing) following a recommendation from the Special Consideration Board in accordance with 6.7 above, further requests for Special Consideration made due to similar circumstances should be rejected. 

7.1 The University's Student Support Review process outlines how the University will respond to situations where visible signs of illness, mental health difficulties, psychological, personality or emotional disorders may have a profoundly disturbing impact on the functioning of individual students and on the wellbeing of others around them. The procedure outlines support available to both students and staff and may be referred to should a student's Special Consideration request(s) raise cause for concern. 

7.2 Any programme of study which has a practice component which will lead to a professional registration will be governed by a requirement that students demonstrate their Fitness to Practise. A student's Fitness to Practise may be challenged when their behaviour, health and/or professional conduct gives cause for concern. In these circumstances, a student should be considered under the Regulations Governing Fitness to Practise. 

7.3 The Code of Practice for Research Candidature and Supervision and Regulations for Research Degrees provide information to students enrolled on research degrees wishing to suspend their studies or extend their candidature due to exceptional circumstances. 

7.4 A student wishing to appeal against an academic decision made by the University should refer to the Regulations Governing Academic Appeals by Students. 

7.5 Definitions of terms can be found in the Regulations and Definitions Applying to Progression for all Credit Bearing Programmes. 

7.6 The Regulations governing Progression, Determination and Classification of Results: Undergraduate and Integrated Masters Programmes and Progression, Determination and Classification of Results: Postgraduate Master's Programmes provide information related to student progression. 

7.7 Information related to the award of an aegrotat degree, diploma or certificate can be found in The Ordinances of the University.

7.8 If information about a safeguarding incident is disclosed the Safeguarding Children and Vulnerable Adults Policy should be referred to. 

1.1 You must submit a Special Consideration form and supporting information as soon as possible. Requests should be submitted within 5 working days of any assessment which may have been affected by exceptional circumstances. We do understand that this may not be physically possible in a small number of circumstances.  If this is the case, and the end of academic year deadline has not passed, you should submit your application as soon as possible with an explanation for the delay.

1.2 If you are unable to submit supporting information at the same time as the form, you should declare this on the application and should submit the documentation within 2 weeks of submitting the form.  If you are unable to submit the supporting information within 2 weeks, you must contact us to explain the delay and discuss and agree a time when this will be available.  We may refuse to consider your case if an agreement regarding supporting information is not in place.

1.3 The Special Consideration Board will not consider and may reject Special Consideration requests which are incomplete in any material aspect and do not include sufficient supporting information, or a valid explanation of why that cannot be provided. 

1.4 The appropriate Team will ensure all relevant information is collated and taken into account by the Special Consideration Assessors/Board, including that mentioned in section A 4. 

1.5 You must not lobby individual Board members about the decisions of the Special Consideration Board. 

1.6 Cases raised by a member of staff: Where a member of staff, such as a module or programme lead, is aware of exceptional circumstances affecting a group or cohort of students (as outlined in A 2.2 above), they shall advise the Deputy Head of School (Education) for that School of the matter and provide such additional information as the Deputy Head of School (Education) may require. The Deputy Head of School (Education) for that School shall decide whether to make a decision and refer the case directly to the Board of Examiners. In these circumstances the relevant students should be notified that individual requests are not needed by students or where made already, will instead be considered as a group matter.  

2.1 The Special Consideration Assessors will decide whether the case is appropriate in line with the Regulations. Special Consideration Assessors may choose to consult with another member of the Board before making that decision. If they decide that the request is not appropriate in line with the policy, they should let you know student as soon as possible.  

Requests for extensions of a deadline, removal of a late penalty and other time critical decision: 

2.2 Special Consideration Assessors will decide on Special Consideration requests for the extension of a deadline, removal of a late penalty or other time critical decision provided the request is appropriately completed and has supporting information as and when the need arises. Special Consideration Assessors may choose to consult with another member of the Board and the relevant tutor before making that decision. They should advise you of the decision as soon as possible. 

2.4 The Special Consideration Board will decide on all other special consideration requests which are appropriately completed, have supporting information and which are received at least three days in advance of their next available meeting. Where there is less than three days' notice, Semester 1 applications may need to be held over until the next meeting.  If the application is made in Semester 2 and is received less than three days prior to the meeting, your case cannot be considered and you will need to submit an academic appeal.  

2.5 The Special Consideration Board shall discuss the merits of the special consideration request in private. 

2.6 Before the Special Consideration Board makes a recommendation, it may require you to attend a meeting with a member of academic staff to discuss your request and the supporting information you have submitted.